Egypt vs Uganda: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015

Egypt
0.0483 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Uganda
0.046 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Egypt rank
63rd
Uganda rank
66th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 over time

  • Egypt
  • Uganda
0.010.020.030.040.05197019962023

How they compare

Egypt currently reports 0.0483 million USD per square kilometre against 0.046 million USD per square kilometre in Uganda, a difference of 0.0023 million USD per square kilometre.

That makes Egypt's figure about 1.1 times Uganda's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Uganda ahead.

Egypt ranks 63rd and Uganda ranks 66th of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Egypt averaged higher in 4 and Uganda in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Egypt Uganda Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0102 million USD per square kilometre 0.0131 million USD per square kilometre 0.0029 million USD per square kilometre Uganda
1980s 0.0136 million USD per square kilometre 0.0125 million USD per square kilometre 0.0011 million USD per square kilometre Egypt
1990s 0.0186 million USD per square kilometre 0.0181 million USD per square kilometre 0.0005 million USD per square kilometre Egypt
2000s 0.0262 million USD per square kilometre 0.0269 million USD per square kilometre 0.0007 million USD per square kilometre Uganda
2010s 0.036 million USD per square kilometre 0.0335 million USD per square kilometre 0.0025 million USD per square kilometre Egypt
2020s 0.0455 million USD per square kilometre 0.0435 million USD per square kilometre 0.002 million USD per square kilometre Egypt

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015, Egypt or Uganda?
Egypt, at 0.0483 million USD per square kilometre against 0.046 million USD per square kilometre in Uganda as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015 between Egypt and Uganda?
0.0023 million USD per square kilometre, with Egypt ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Uganda?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Egypt and Uganda rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015?
Egypt ranks 63rd and Uganda ranks 66th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Egypt vs Uganda: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/egypt-arab-rep/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/egypt-arab-rep/uganda/">Egypt vs Uganda: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 9,031 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.