El Salvador vs Ireland: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015

El Salvador
0.0656 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Ireland
0.0673 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
El Salvador rank
48th
Ireland rank
46th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 over time

  • El Salvador
  • Ireland
0.020.040.060.080.1197019962023

How they compare

Ireland currently reports 0.0673 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0656 million USD per square kilometre in El Salvador, a difference of 0.0017 million USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was El Salvador ahead.

El Salvador ranks 48th and Ireland ranks 46th of 180 countries.

El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade El Salvador Ireland Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0875 million USD per square kilometre 0.0265 million USD per square kilometre 0.0609 million USD per square kilometre El Salvador
1980s 0.0897 million USD per square kilometre 0.0317 million USD per square kilometre 0.0579 million USD per square kilometre El Salvador
1990s 0.0866 million USD per square kilometre 0.0393 million USD per square kilometre 0.0473 million USD per square kilometre El Salvador
2000s 0.0679 million USD per square kilometre 0.0303 million USD per square kilometre 0.0375 million USD per square kilometre El Salvador
2010s 0.0673 million USD per square kilometre 0.0372 million USD per square kilometre 0.0301 million USD per square kilometre El Salvador
2020s 0.0653 million USD per square kilometre 0.0573 million USD per square kilometre 0.008 million USD per square kilometre El Salvador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015, El Salvador or Ireland?
Ireland, at 0.0673 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0656 million USD per square kilometre in El Salvador as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015 between El Salvador and Ireland?
0.0017 million USD per square kilometre, with Ireland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Ireland?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do El Salvador and Ireland rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015?
El Salvador ranks 48th and Ireland ranks 46th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

El Salvador vs Ireland: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/el-salvador/ireland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/el-salvador/ireland/">El Salvador vs Ireland: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 9,031 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.