Eswatini vs New Caledonia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015

Eswatini
0.0211 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
New Caledonia
0.0205 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini rank
109th
New Caledonia rank
110th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 over time

  • Eswatini
  • New Caledonia
00.0050.010.0150.020.025197019962023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 0.0211 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0205 million USD per square kilometre in New Caledonia, a difference of 0.0006 million USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was New Caledonia ahead.

Eswatini ranks 109th and New Caledonia ranks 110th of 180 countries.

Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini New Caledonia Difference Ahead
1970s 0.008 million USD per square kilometre 0.0053 million USD per square kilometre 0.0027 million USD per square kilometre Eswatini
1980s 0.0134 million USD per square kilometre 0.003 million USD per square kilometre 0.0103 million USD per square kilometre Eswatini
1990s 0.0118 million USD per square kilometre 0.0051 million USD per square kilometre 0.0066 million USD per square kilometre Eswatini
2000s 0.0176 million USD per square kilometre 0.0059 million USD per square kilometre 0.0117 million USD per square kilometre Eswatini
2010s 0.0206 million USD per square kilometre 0.0092 million USD per square kilometre 0.0114 million USD per square kilometre Eswatini
2020s 0.0203 million USD per square kilometre 0.0178 million USD per square kilometre 0.0025 million USD per square kilometre Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015, Eswatini or New Caledonia?
Eswatini, at 0.0211 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0205 million USD per square kilometre in New Caledonia as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015 between Eswatini and New Caledonia?
0.0006 million USD per square kilometre, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and New Caledonia?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and New Caledonia rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015?
Eswatini ranks 109th and New Caledonia ranks 110th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs New Caledonia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/new-caledonia/">Eswatini vs New Caledonia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 9,031 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.