Guatemala vs Kiribati: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015

Guatemala
0.0698 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Kiribati
0.072 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala rank
45th
Kiribati rank
44th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 over time

  • Guatemala
  • Kiribati
0.020.040.060.08197019962023

How they compare

Kiribati currently reports 0.072 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0698 million USD per square kilometre in Guatemala, a difference of 0.0022 million USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Kiribati ahead.

Guatemala ranks 45th and Kiribati ranks 44th of 180 countries.

Kiribati has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Kiribati Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0204 million USD per square kilometre 0.0488 million USD per square kilometre 0.0284 million USD per square kilometre Kiribati
1980s 0.0248 million USD per square kilometre 0.0427 million USD per square kilometre 0.0179 million USD per square kilometre Kiribati
1990s 0.0318 million USD per square kilometre 0.055 million USD per square kilometre 0.0232 million USD per square kilometre Kiribati
2000s 0.0423 million USD per square kilometre 0.0479 million USD per square kilometre 0.0057 million USD per square kilometre Kiribati
2010s 0.0568 million USD per square kilometre 0.0598 million USD per square kilometre 0.003 million USD per square kilometre Kiribati
2020s 0.0671 million USD per square kilometre 0.0725 million USD per square kilometre 0.0054 million USD per square kilometre Kiribati

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015, Guatemala or Kiribati?
Kiribati, at 0.072 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0698 million USD per square kilometre in Guatemala as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015 between Guatemala and Kiribati?
0.0022 million USD per square kilometre, with Kiribati ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Kiribati?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and Kiribati rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015?
Guatemala ranks 45th and Kiribati ranks 44th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Kiribati: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/kiribati/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/kiribati/">Guatemala vs Kiribati: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 9,031 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.