Guinea vs Iceland: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015

Guinea
0.0123 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland
0.0115 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Guinea rank
131st
Iceland rank
133rd

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 over time

  • Guinea
  • Iceland
0.0030.0050.0070.010.013197019962023

How they compare

Guinea currently reports 0.0123 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0115 million USD per square kilometre in Iceland, a difference of 0.0008 million USD per square kilometre.

That makes Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Iceland's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Iceland ahead.

Guinea ranks 131st and Iceland ranks 133rd of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Iceland in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea Iceland Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0016 million USD per square kilometre 0.0069 million USD per square kilometre 0.0053 million USD per square kilometre Iceland
1980s 0.002 million USD per square kilometre 0.0092 million USD per square kilometre 0.0073 million USD per square kilometre Iceland
1990s 0.0028 million USD per square kilometre 0.0099 million USD per square kilometre 0.0071 million USD per square kilometre Iceland
2000s 0.0041 million USD per square kilometre 0.0093 million USD per square kilometre 0.0053 million USD per square kilometre Iceland
2010s 0.0069 million USD per square kilometre 0.0091 million USD per square kilometre 0.0023 million USD per square kilometre Iceland
2020s 0.0113 million USD per square kilometre 0.0111 million USD per square kilometre 0.0002 million USD per square kilometre Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015, Guinea or Iceland?
Guinea, at 0.0123 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0115 million USD per square kilometre in Iceland as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015 between Guinea and Iceland?
0.0008 million USD per square kilometre, with Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Iceland?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Guinea and Iceland rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015?
Guinea ranks 131st and Iceland ranks 133rd of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea vs Iceland: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/guinea/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/guinea/iceland/">Guinea vs Iceland: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 9,031 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.