Guyana vs Mozambique: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015

Guyana
0.0062 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Mozambique
0.0065 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Guyana rank
154th
Mozambique rank
153rd

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 over time

  • Guyana
  • Mozambique
00.0020.0040.006197019962023

How they compare

Mozambique currently reports 0.0065 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0062 million USD per square kilometre in Guyana, a difference of 0.0003 million USD per square kilometre.

That makes Mozambique's figure about 1.1 times Guyana's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Mozambique ahead.

Guyana ranks 154th and Mozambique ranks 153rd of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Guyana averaged higher in 2 and Mozambique in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guyana Mozambique Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0009 million USD per square kilometre 0.0013 million USD per square kilometre 0.0003 million USD per square kilometre Mozambique
1980s 0.0009 million USD per square kilometre 0.0014 million USD per square kilometre 0.0005 million USD per square kilometre Mozambique
1990s 0.0012 million USD per square kilometre 0.0018 million USD per square kilometre 0.0006 million USD per square kilometre Mozambique
2000s 0.0033 million USD per square kilometre 0.003 million USD per square kilometre 0.0003 million USD per square kilometre Guyana
2010s 0.0052 million USD per square kilometre 0.0048 million USD per square kilometre 0.0004 million USD per square kilometre Guyana
2020s 0.0057 million USD per square kilometre 0.0061 million USD per square kilometre 0.0004 million USD per square kilometre Mozambique

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015, Guyana or Mozambique?
Mozambique, at 0.0065 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0062 million USD per square kilometre in Guyana as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015 between Guyana and Mozambique?
0.0003 million USD per square kilometre, with Mozambique ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guyana and Mozambique?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Guyana and Mozambique rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015?
Guyana ranks 154th and Mozambique ranks 153rd of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guyana vs Mozambique: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/guyana/mozambique/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/guyana/mozambique/">Guyana vs Mozambique: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 9,031 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.