Iceland vs Peru: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015

Iceland
0.0115 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Peru
0.0128 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland rank
133rd
Peru rank
130th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 over time

  • Iceland
  • Peru
0.0030.0050.0070.010.013197019962023

How they compare

Peru currently reports 0.0128 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0115 million USD per square kilometre in Iceland, a difference of 0.0013 million USD per square kilometre.

That makes Peru's figure about 1.1 times Iceland's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Iceland ahead.

Iceland ranks 133rd and Peru ranks 130th of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 4 and Peru in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland Peru Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0069 million USD per square kilometre 0.0033 million USD per square kilometre 0.0036 million USD per square kilometre Iceland
1980s 0.0092 million USD per square kilometre 0.0038 million USD per square kilometre 0.0055 million USD per square kilometre Iceland
1990s 0.0099 million USD per square kilometre 0.0049 million USD per square kilometre 0.0051 million USD per square kilometre Iceland
2000s 0.0093 million USD per square kilometre 0.0075 million USD per square kilometre 0.0018 million USD per square kilometre Iceland
2010s 0.0091 million USD per square kilometre 0.0105 million USD per square kilometre 0.0014 million USD per square kilometre Peru
2020s 0.0111 million USD per square kilometre 0.0129 million USD per square kilometre 0.0018 million USD per square kilometre Peru

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015, Iceland or Peru?
Peru, at 0.0128 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0115 million USD per square kilometre in Iceland as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015 between Iceland and Peru?
0.0013 million USD per square kilometre, with Peru ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Peru?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Iceland and Peru rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015?
Iceland ranks 133rd and Peru ranks 130th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs Peru: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/iceland/peru/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/iceland/peru/">Iceland vs Peru: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 9,031 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.