India vs Singapore: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015

India
0.1666 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Singapore
0.1597 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
India rank
11th
Singapore rank
12th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 over time

  • India
  • Singapore
00.10.20.30.40.5197019962023

How they compare

India currently reports 0.1666 million USD per square kilometre against 0.1597 million USD per square kilometre in Singapore, a difference of 0.0069 million USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Singapore ahead.

India ranks 11th and Singapore ranks 12th of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, India averaged higher in 1 and Singapore in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade India Singapore Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0386 million USD per square kilometre 0.3858 million USD per square kilometre 0.3472 million USD per square kilometre Singapore
1980s 0.0498 million USD per square kilometre 0.3987 million USD per square kilometre 0.349 million USD per square kilometre Singapore
1990s 0.0684 million USD per square kilometre 0.2185 million USD per square kilometre 0.1501 million USD per square kilometre Singapore
2000s 0.0861 million USD per square kilometre 0.1302 million USD per square kilometre 0.0441 million USD per square kilometre Singapore
2010s 0.1207 million USD per square kilometre 0.14 million USD per square kilometre 0.0193 million USD per square kilometre Singapore
2020s 0.1594 million USD per square kilometre 0.1588 million USD per square kilometre 0.0006 million USD per square kilometre India

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015, India or Singapore?
India, at 0.1666 million USD per square kilometre against 0.1597 million USD per square kilometre in Singapore as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015 between India and Singapore?
0.0069 million USD per square kilometre, with India ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for India and Singapore?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do India and Singapore rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015?
India ranks 11th and Singapore ranks 12th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

India vs Singapore: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/india/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/india/singapore/">India vs Singapore: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 9,031 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.