Indonesia vs Thailand: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015

Indonesia
0.0762 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Thailand
0.0785 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Indonesia rank
39th
Thailand rank
37th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 over time

  • Indonesia
  • Thailand
0.020.040.060.08197019962023

How they compare

Thailand currently reports 0.0785 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0762 million USD per square kilometre in Indonesia, a difference of 0.0023 million USD per square kilometre.

Across all 54 years both countries report, Thailand has been ahead every year.

Indonesia ranks 39th and Thailand ranks 37th of 180 countries.

Thailand has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Indonesia Thailand Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0172 million USD per square kilometre 0.0217 million USD per square kilometre 0.0045 million USD per square kilometre Thailand
1980s 0.0247 million USD per square kilometre 0.0318 million USD per square kilometre 0.0071 million USD per square kilometre Thailand
1990s 0.0339 million USD per square kilometre 0.0455 million USD per square kilometre 0.0116 million USD per square kilometre Thailand
2000s 0.0419 million USD per square kilometre 0.0626 million USD per square kilometre 0.0207 million USD per square kilometre Thailand
2010s 0.0608 million USD per square kilometre 0.0727 million USD per square kilometre 0.0119 million USD per square kilometre Thailand
2020s 0.0744 million USD per square kilometre 0.076 million USD per square kilometre 0.0016 million USD per square kilometre Thailand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015, Indonesia or Thailand?
Thailand, at 0.0785 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0762 million USD per square kilometre in Indonesia as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015 between Indonesia and Thailand?
0.0023 million USD per square kilometre, with Thailand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Thailand?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Indonesia and Thailand rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015?
Indonesia ranks 39th and Thailand ranks 37th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Indonesia vs Thailand: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/indonesia/thailand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/indonesia/thailand/">Indonesia vs Thailand: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 9,031 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.