Israel vs Mauritius: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015

Israel
0.2116 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius
0.2482 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Israel rank
10th
Mauritius rank
7th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 over time

  • Israel
  • Mauritius
0.050.10.150.20.25197019962023

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 0.2482 million USD per square kilometre against 0.2116 million USD per square kilometre in Israel, a difference of 0.0366 million USD per square kilometre.

That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.2 times Israel's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Israel ahead.

Israel ranks 10th and Mauritius ranks 7th of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Israel averaged higher in 5 and Mauritius in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Israel Mauritius Difference Ahead
1970s 0.1274 million USD per square kilometre 0.1033 million USD per square kilometre 0.024 million USD per square kilometre Israel
1980s 0.1246 million USD per square kilometre 0.1176 million USD per square kilometre 0.0071 million USD per square kilometre Israel
1990s 0.1283 million USD per square kilometre 0.1277 million USD per square kilometre 0.0006 million USD per square kilometre Israel
2000s 0.1964 million USD per square kilometre 0.1427 million USD per square kilometre 0.0536 million USD per square kilometre Israel
2010s 0.217 million USD per square kilometre 0.1833 million USD per square kilometre 0.0337 million USD per square kilometre Israel
2020s 0.2147 million USD per square kilometre 0.2166 million USD per square kilometre 0.0019 million USD per square kilometre Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015, Israel or Mauritius?
Mauritius, at 0.2482 million USD per square kilometre against 0.2116 million USD per square kilometre in Israel as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015 between Israel and Mauritius?
0.0366 million USD per square kilometre, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Mauritius?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Israel and Mauritius rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015?
Israel ranks 10th and Mauritius ranks 7th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Israel vs Mauritius: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/israel/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/israel/mauritius/">Israel vs Mauritius: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 9,031 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.