Jamaica vs Pakistan: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015

Jamaica
0.1032 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Pakistan
0.1103 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Jamaica rank
30th
Pakistan rank
28th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 over time

  • Jamaica
  • Pakistan
0.020.040.060.080.10.12197019962023

How they compare

Pakistan currently reports 0.1103 million USD per square kilometre against 0.1032 million USD per square kilometre in Jamaica, a difference of 0.0071 million USD per square kilometre.

That makes Pakistan's figure about 1.1 times Jamaica's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Jamaica ahead.

Jamaica ranks 30th and Pakistan ranks 28th of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Jamaica averaged higher in 4 and Pakistan in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jamaica Pakistan Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0551 million USD per square kilometre 0.0196 million USD per square kilometre 0.0355 million USD per square kilometre Jamaica
1980s 0.0553 million USD per square kilometre 0.0276 million USD per square kilometre 0.0277 million USD per square kilometre Jamaica
1990s 0.0806 million USD per square kilometre 0.0434 million USD per square kilometre 0.0372 million USD per square kilometre Jamaica
2000s 0.0715 million USD per square kilometre 0.0689 million USD per square kilometre 0.0027 million USD per square kilometre Jamaica
2010s 0.0859 million USD per square kilometre 0.0878 million USD per square kilometre 0.0018 million USD per square kilometre Pakistan
2020s 0.1015 million USD per square kilometre 0.1054 million USD per square kilometre 0.0039 million USD per square kilometre Pakistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015, Jamaica or Pakistan?
Pakistan, at 0.1103 million USD per square kilometre against 0.1032 million USD per square kilometre in Jamaica as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015 between Jamaica and Pakistan?
0.0071 million USD per square kilometre, with Pakistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Pakistan?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Jamaica and Pakistan rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015?
Jamaica ranks 30th and Pakistan ranks 28th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jamaica vs Pakistan: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/jamaica/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/jamaica/pakistan/">Jamaica vs Pakistan: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 9,031 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.