Jamaica vs Sri Lanka: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015

Jamaica
0.1032 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Sri Lanka
0.1112 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Jamaica rank
30th
Sri Lanka rank
27th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 over time

  • Jamaica
  • Sri Lanka
0.020.040.060.080.10.12197019962023

How they compare

Sri Lanka currently reports 0.1112 million USD per square kilometre against 0.1032 million USD per square kilometre in Jamaica, a difference of 0.008 million USD per square kilometre.

That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 1.1 times Jamaica's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Jamaica ahead.

Jamaica ranks 30th and Sri Lanka ranks 27th of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Jamaica averaged higher in 4 and Sri Lanka in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jamaica Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0551 million USD per square kilometre 0.0326 million USD per square kilometre 0.0224 million USD per square kilometre Jamaica
1980s 0.0553 million USD per square kilometre 0.0442 million USD per square kilometre 0.0112 million USD per square kilometre Jamaica
1990s 0.0806 million USD per square kilometre 0.0525 million USD per square kilometre 0.0281 million USD per square kilometre Jamaica
2000s 0.0715 million USD per square kilometre 0.0645 million USD per square kilometre 0.0071 million USD per square kilometre Jamaica
2010s 0.0859 million USD per square kilometre 0.1036 million USD per square kilometre 0.0177 million USD per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2020s 0.1015 million USD per square kilometre 0.1112 million USD per square kilometre 0.0097 million USD per square kilometre Sri Lanka

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015, Jamaica or Sri Lanka?
Sri Lanka, at 0.1112 million USD per square kilometre against 0.1032 million USD per square kilometre in Jamaica as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015 between Jamaica and Sri Lanka?
0.008 million USD per square kilometre, with Sri Lanka ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Sri Lanka?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Jamaica and Sri Lanka rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015?
Jamaica ranks 30th and Sri Lanka ranks 27th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jamaica vs Sri Lanka: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/jamaica/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/jamaica/sri-lanka/">Jamaica vs Sri Lanka: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 9,031 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.