Jordan vs Tunisia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015

Jordan
0.0247 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Tunisia
0.0262 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Jordan rank
97th
Tunisia rank
95th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 over time

  • Jordan
  • Tunisia
00.010.020.03197019962023

How they compare

Tunisia currently reports 0.0262 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0247 million USD per square kilometre in Jordan, a difference of 0.0015 million USD per square kilometre.

That makes Tunisia's figure about 1.1 times Jordan's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Tunisia ahead.

Jordan ranks 97th and Tunisia ranks 95th of 180 countries.

Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jordan Tunisia Difference Ahead
1970s 0.006 million USD per square kilometre 0.0087 million USD per square kilometre 0.0026 million USD per square kilometre Tunisia
1980s 0.0078 million USD per square kilometre 0.0108 million USD per square kilometre 0.003 million USD per square kilometre Tunisia
1990s 0.0105 million USD per square kilometre 0.0155 million USD per square kilometre 0.005 million USD per square kilometre Tunisia
2000s 0.0123 million USD per square kilometre 0.0203 million USD per square kilometre 0.008 million USD per square kilometre Tunisia
2010s 0.0192 million USD per square kilometre 0.026 million USD per square kilometre 0.0068 million USD per square kilometre Tunisia
2020s 0.023 million USD per square kilometre 0.0286 million USD per square kilometre 0.0057 million USD per square kilometre Tunisia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015, Jordan or Tunisia?
Tunisia, at 0.0262 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0247 million USD per square kilometre in Jordan as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015 between Jordan and Tunisia?
0.0015 million USD per square kilometre, with Tunisia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Tunisia?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Jordan and Tunisia rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015?
Jordan ranks 97th and Tunisia ranks 95th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jordan vs Tunisia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/jordan/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/jordan/tunisia/">Jordan vs Tunisia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 9,031 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.