Kuwait vs Poland: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015

Kuwait
0.0448 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Poland
0.0419 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Kuwait rank
69th
Poland rank
72nd

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 over time

  • Kuwait
  • Poland
00.010.020.030.040.05197019962023

How they compare

Kuwait currently reports 0.0448 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0419 million USD per square kilometre in Poland, a difference of 0.0029 million USD per square kilometre.

That makes Kuwait's figure about 1.1 times Poland's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Poland ahead.

Kuwait ranks 69th and Poland ranks 72nd of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Kuwait averaged higher in 1 and Poland in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kuwait Poland Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0033 million USD per square kilometre 0.0206 million USD per square kilometre 0.0173 million USD per square kilometre Poland
1980s 0.0088 million USD per square kilometre 0.0246 million USD per square kilometre 0.0159 million USD per square kilometre Poland
1990s 0.0101 million USD per square kilometre 0.0333 million USD per square kilometre 0.0233 million USD per square kilometre Poland
2000s 0.0137 million USD per square kilometre 0.0368 million USD per square kilometre 0.0231 million USD per square kilometre Poland
2010s 0.0345 million USD per square kilometre 0.0397 million USD per square kilometre 0.0052 million USD per square kilometre Poland
2020s 0.0403 million USD per square kilometre 0.0389 million USD per square kilometre 0.0013 million USD per square kilometre Kuwait

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015, Kuwait or Poland?
Kuwait, at 0.0448 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0419 million USD per square kilometre in Poland as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015 between Kuwait and Poland?
0.0029 million USD per square kilometre, with Kuwait ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kuwait and Poland?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Kuwait and Poland rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015?
Kuwait ranks 69th and Poland ranks 72nd of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kuwait vs Poland: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/kuwait/poland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/kuwait/poland/">Kuwait vs Poland: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 9,031 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.