How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Sudan?

12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Latvia vs Sudan: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015

Latvia

0.0135 million USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Sudan

0.0144 million USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Latvia rank

125th

Sudan rank

124th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 over time

Latvia
Sudan

How they compare

Sudan currently reports 0.0144 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0135 million USD per square kilometre in Latvia, a difference of 0.0009 million USD per square kilometre.

That makes Sudan's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Latvia ahead.

Latvia ranks 125th and Sudan ranks 124th of 180 countries.

Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Latvia	Sudan	Difference	Ahead
2010s	0.0147 million USD per square kilometre	0.0145 million USD per square kilometre	0.0002 million USD per square kilometre	Latvia
2020s	0.0156 million USD per square kilometre	0.0152 million USD per square kilometre	0.0003 million USD per square kilometre	Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015, Latvia or Sudan?: Sudan, at 0.0144 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0135 million USD per square kilometre in Latvia as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015 between Latvia and Sudan?: 0.0009 million USD per square kilometre, with Sudan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Sudan?: 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
How do Latvia and Sudan rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015?: Latvia ranks 125th and Sudan ranks 124th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs Sudan: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/latvia/sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/latvia/sudan/">Latvia vs Sudan: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit: million USD per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 181 places, 9,031 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed: 11 September 2026

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.