How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Sweden?

32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Latvia vs Sweden: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015

Latvia

0.0135 million USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Sweden

0.0131 million USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Latvia rank

125th

Sweden rank

128th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 over time

Latvia
Sweden

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 0.0135 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0131 million USD per square kilometre in Sweden, a difference of 0.0004 million USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.

Latvia ranks 125th and Sweden ranks 128th of 180 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and Sweden in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Latvia	Sweden	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.01 million USD per square kilometre	0.0113 million USD per square kilometre	0.0013 million USD per square kilometre	Sweden
2000s	0.0118 million USD per square kilometre	0.0125 million USD per square kilometre	0.0007 million USD per square kilometre	Sweden
2010s	0.0143 million USD per square kilometre	0.0148 million USD per square kilometre	0.0005 million USD per square kilometre	Sweden
2020s	0.0156 million USD per square kilometre	0.0145 million USD per square kilometre	0.001 million USD per square kilometre	Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015, Latvia or Sweden?: Latvia, at 0.0135 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0131 million USD per square kilometre in Sweden as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015 between Latvia and Sweden?: 0.0004 million USD per square kilometre, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Sweden?: 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Latvia and Sweden rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015?: Latvia ranks 125th and Sweden ranks 128th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs Sweden: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/latvia/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/latvia/sweden/">Latvia vs Sweden: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit: million USD per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 181 places, 9,031 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed: 11 September 2026

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.