Latvia vs Turkmenistan: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015

Latvia
0.0135 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Turkmenistan
0.0135 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Latvia rank
125th
Turkmenistan rank
126th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 over time

  • Latvia
  • Turkmenistan
0.0050.010.015199220072023

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 0.0135 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0135 million USD per square kilometre in Turkmenistan, a difference of 0 million USD per square kilometre.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.

Latvia ranks 125th and Turkmenistan ranks 126th of 180 countries.

Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia Turkmenistan Difference Ahead
1990s 0.01 million USD per square kilometre 0.0048 million USD per square kilometre 0.0052 million USD per square kilometre Latvia
2000s 0.0118 million USD per square kilometre 0.0062 million USD per square kilometre 0.0057 million USD per square kilometre Latvia
2010s 0.0143 million USD per square kilometre 0.0075 million USD per square kilometre 0.0069 million USD per square kilometre Latvia
2020s 0.0156 million USD per square kilometre 0.0124 million USD per square kilometre 0.0032 million USD per square kilometre Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015, Latvia or Turkmenistan?
Latvia, at 0.0135 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0135 million USD per square kilometre in Turkmenistan as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015 between Latvia and Turkmenistan?
0 million USD per square kilometre, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Turkmenistan?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Latvia and Turkmenistan rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015?
Latvia ranks 125th and Turkmenistan ranks 126th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs Turkmenistan: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/latvia/turkmenistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/latvia/turkmenistan/">Latvia vs Turkmenistan: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 9,031 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.