Morocco vs New Zealand: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015

Morocco
0.0328 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
New Zealand
0.0334 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Morocco rank
84th
New Zealand rank
82nd

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 over time

  • Morocco
  • New Zealand
0.010.020.030.04197019962023

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 0.0334 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0328 million USD per square kilometre in Morocco, a difference of 0.0006 million USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was New Zealand ahead.

Morocco ranks 84th and New Zealand ranks 82nd of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Morocco averaged higher in 1 and New Zealand in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Morocco New Zealand Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0086 million USD per square kilometre 0.0131 million USD per square kilometre 0.0045 million USD per square kilometre New Zealand
1980s 0.0107 million USD per square kilometre 0.0163 million USD per square kilometre 0.0056 million USD per square kilometre New Zealand
1990s 0.0135 million USD per square kilometre 0.0222 million USD per square kilometre 0.0087 million USD per square kilometre New Zealand
2000s 0.0171 million USD per square kilometre 0.0263 million USD per square kilometre 0.0092 million USD per square kilometre New Zealand
2010s 0.0274 million USD per square kilometre 0.0289 million USD per square kilometre 0.0015 million USD per square kilometre New Zealand
2020s 0.0332 million USD per square kilometre 0.0315 million USD per square kilometre 0.0017 million USD per square kilometre Morocco

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015, Morocco or New Zealand?
New Zealand, at 0.0334 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0328 million USD per square kilometre in Morocco as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015 between Morocco and New Zealand?
0.0006 million USD per square kilometre, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Morocco and New Zealand?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Morocco and New Zealand rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015?
Morocco ranks 84th and New Zealand ranks 82nd of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Morocco vs New Zealand: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/morocco/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/morocco/new-zealand/">Morocco vs New Zealand: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 9,031 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.