Namibia vs South Sudan: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015

Namibia
0.001 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
South Sudan
0.0003 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia rank
177th
South Sudan rank
180th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 over time

  • Namibia
  • South Sudan
00.0010.0010.0010.001197019962023

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 0.001 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0003 million USD per square kilometre in South Sudan, a difference of 0.0007 million USD per square kilometre.

That makes Namibia's figure about 3.5 times South Sudan's.

Across all 12 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.

Namibia ranks 177th and South Sudan ranks 180th of 180 countries.

Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Namibia South Sudan Difference Ahead
2010s 0.001 million USD per square kilometre 0.0004 million USD per square kilometre 0.0006 million USD per square kilometre Namibia
2020s 0.001 million USD per square kilometre 0.0004 million USD per square kilometre 0.0007 million USD per square kilometre Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015, Namibia or South Sudan?
Namibia, at 0.001 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0003 million USD per square kilometre in South Sudan as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015 between Namibia and South Sudan?
0.0007 million USD per square kilometre, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and South Sudan?
12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
How do Namibia and South Sudan rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015?
Namibia ranks 177th and South Sudan ranks 180th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Namibia vs South Sudan: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/namibia/south-sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/namibia/south-sudan/">Namibia vs South Sudan: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 9,031 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.