New Caledonia vs Senegal: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015

New Caledonia
0.0205 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Senegal
0.0214 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
New Caledonia rank
110th
Senegal rank
108th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 over time

  • New Caledonia
  • Senegal
00.0050.010.0150.02197019962023

How they compare

Senegal currently reports 0.0214 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0205 million USD per square kilometre in New Caledonia, a difference of 0.0009 million USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Senegal ahead.

New Caledonia ranks 110th and Senegal ranks 108th of 180 countries.

Senegal has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Caledonia Senegal Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0053 million USD per square kilometre 0.0062 million USD per square kilometre 0.0008 million USD per square kilometre Senegal
1980s 0.003 million USD per square kilometre 0.0064 million USD per square kilometre 0.0034 million USD per square kilometre Senegal
1990s 0.0051 million USD per square kilometre 0.0076 million USD per square kilometre 0.0025 million USD per square kilometre Senegal
2000s 0.0059 million USD per square kilometre 0.0095 million USD per square kilometre 0.0036 million USD per square kilometre Senegal
2010s 0.0092 million USD per square kilometre 0.0135 million USD per square kilometre 0.0043 million USD per square kilometre Senegal
2020s 0.0178 million USD per square kilometre 0.0201 million USD per square kilometre 0.0023 million USD per square kilometre Senegal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015, New Caledonia or Senegal?
Senegal, at 0.0214 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0205 million USD per square kilometre in New Caledonia as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015 between New Caledonia and Senegal?
0.0009 million USD per square kilometre, with Senegal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and Senegal?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do New Caledonia and Senegal rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015?
New Caledonia ranks 110th and Senegal ranks 108th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Caledonia vs Senegal: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/new-caledonia/senegal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/new-caledonia/senegal/">New Caledonia vs Senegal: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 9,031 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.