How many years of comparable data are there for Norway and Palau?

33 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Norway vs Palau: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015

Norway

0.0173 million USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Palau

0.0173 million USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Norway rank

117th

Palau rank

116th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 over time

Norway
Palau

How they compare

Palau currently reports 0.0173 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0173 million USD per square kilometre in Norway, a difference of 0 million USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Palau ahead.

Norway ranks 117th and Palau ranks 116th of 180 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Norway averaged higher in 1 and Palau in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Norway	Palau	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0097 million USD per square kilometre	0.0185 million USD per square kilometre	0.0088 million USD per square kilometre	Palau
2000s	0.0115 million USD per square kilometre	0.0212 million USD per square kilometre	0.0097 million USD per square kilometre	Palau
2010s	0.0156 million USD per square kilometre	0.0212 million USD per square kilometre	0.0056 million USD per square kilometre	Palau
2020s	0.0175 million USD per square kilometre	0.0174 million USD per square kilometre	0.0001 million USD per square kilometre	Norway

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015, Norway or Palau?: Palau, at 0.0173 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0173 million USD per square kilometre in Norway as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015 between Norway and Palau?: 0 million USD per square kilometre, with Palau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Norway and Palau?: 33 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2023.
How do Norway and Palau rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015?: Norway ranks 117th and Palau ranks 116th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Norway vs Palau: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/norway/palau/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/norway/palau/">Norway vs Palau: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit: million USD per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 181 places, 9,031 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed: 11 September 2026

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.