Panama vs Tunisia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015

Panama
0.0277 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Tunisia
0.0262 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Panama rank
92nd
Tunisia rank
95th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 over time

  • Panama
  • Tunisia
0.0050.010.0150.020.0250.03197019962023

How they compare

Panama currently reports 0.0277 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0262 million USD per square kilometre in Tunisia, a difference of 0.0015 million USD per square kilometre.

That makes Panama's figure about 1.1 times Tunisia's.

The two have swapped places 18 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Panama ahead.

Panama ranks 92nd and Tunisia ranks 95th of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Panama averaged higher in 3 and Tunisia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Panama Tunisia Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0088 million USD per square kilometre 0.0087 million USD per square kilometre 0.0002 million USD per square kilometre Panama
1980s 0.0111 million USD per square kilometre 0.0108 million USD per square kilometre 0.0003 million USD per square kilometre Panama
1990s 0.0137 million USD per square kilometre 0.0155 million USD per square kilometre 0.0017 million USD per square kilometre Tunisia
2000s 0.0205 million USD per square kilometre 0.0203 million USD per square kilometre 0.0002 million USD per square kilometre Panama
2010s 0.0215 million USD per square kilometre 0.026 million USD per square kilometre 0.0045 million USD per square kilometre Tunisia
2020s 0.0267 million USD per square kilometre 0.0286 million USD per square kilometre 0.0019 million USD per square kilometre Tunisia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015, Panama or Tunisia?
Panama, at 0.0277 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0262 million USD per square kilometre in Tunisia as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015 between Panama and Tunisia?
0.0015 million USD per square kilometre, with Panama ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and Tunisia?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Panama and Tunisia rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015?
Panama ranks 92nd and Tunisia ranks 95th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Panama vs Tunisia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/panama/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/panama/tunisia/">Panama vs Tunisia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 9,031 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.