Philippines vs Tuvalu: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015

Philippines
0.1208 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Tuvalu
0.1324 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Philippines rank
19th
Tuvalu rank
17th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 over time

  • Philippines
  • Tuvalu
0.050.10.150.20.25197019962023

How they compare

Tuvalu currently reports 0.1324 million USD per square kilometre against 0.1208 million USD per square kilometre in Philippines, a difference of 0.0116 million USD per square kilometre.

That makes Tuvalu's figure about 1.1 times Philippines's.

Across all 54 years both countries report, Tuvalu has been ahead every year.

Philippines ranks 19th and Tuvalu ranks 17th of 180 countries.

Tuvalu has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Philippines Tuvalu Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0436 million USD per square kilometre 0.085 million USD per square kilometre 0.0414 million USD per square kilometre Tuvalu
1980s 0.0549 million USD per square kilometre 0.0989 million USD per square kilometre 0.044 million USD per square kilometre Tuvalu
1990s 0.0632 million USD per square kilometre 0.2074 million USD per square kilometre 0.1442 million USD per square kilometre Tuvalu
2000s 0.0859 million USD per square kilometre 0.2119 million USD per square kilometre 0.1261 million USD per square kilometre Tuvalu
2010s 0.1113 million USD per square kilometre 0.1914 million USD per square kilometre 0.0801 million USD per square kilometre Tuvalu
2020s 0.1196 million USD per square kilometre 0.1337 million USD per square kilometre 0.0141 million USD per square kilometre Tuvalu

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015, Philippines or Tuvalu?
Tuvalu, at 0.1324 million USD per square kilometre against 0.1208 million USD per square kilometre in Philippines as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015 between Philippines and Tuvalu?
0.0116 million USD per square kilometre, with Tuvalu ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Philippines and Tuvalu?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Philippines and Tuvalu rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015?
Philippines ranks 19th and Tuvalu ranks 17th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Philippines vs Tuvalu: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/philippines/tuvalu/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/philippines/tuvalu/">Philippines vs Tuvalu: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 9,031 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.