Poland vs Sierra Leone: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015

Poland
0.0419 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Sierra Leone
0.0426 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Poland rank
72nd
Sierra Leone rank
71st

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 over time

  • Poland
  • Sierra Leone
0.010.020.030.040.05197019962023

How they compare

Sierra Leone currently reports 0.0426 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0419 million USD per square kilometre in Poland, a difference of 0.0007 million USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Poland ahead.

Poland ranks 72nd and Sierra Leone ranks 71st of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Poland averaged higher in 5 and Sierra Leone in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Poland Sierra Leone Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0206 million USD per square kilometre 0.0144 million USD per square kilometre 0.0062 million USD per square kilometre Poland
1980s 0.0246 million USD per square kilometre 0.0197 million USD per square kilometre 0.0049 million USD per square kilometre Poland
1990s 0.0333 million USD per square kilometre 0.0173 million USD per square kilometre 0.0161 million USD per square kilometre Poland
2000s 0.0368 million USD per square kilometre 0.0202 million USD per square kilometre 0.0166 million USD per square kilometre Poland
2010s 0.0397 million USD per square kilometre 0.0342 million USD per square kilometre 0.0054 million USD per square kilometre Poland
2020s 0.0389 million USD per square kilometre 0.041 million USD per square kilometre 0.0021 million USD per square kilometre Sierra Leone

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015, Poland or Sierra Leone?
Sierra Leone, at 0.0426 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0419 million USD per square kilometre in Poland as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015 between Poland and Sierra Leone?
0.0007 million USD per square kilometre, with Sierra Leone ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and Sierra Leone?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Poland and Sierra Leone rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015?
Poland ranks 72nd and Sierra Leone ranks 71st of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Poland vs Sierra Leone: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/poland/sierra-leone/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/poland/sierra-leone/">Poland vs Sierra Leone: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 9,031 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.