Rwanda vs Sri Lanka: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015

Rwanda
0.1115 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Sri Lanka
0.1112 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda rank
26th
Sri Lanka rank
27th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 over time

  • Rwanda
  • Sri Lanka
0.020.040.060.080.10.12197019962023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 0.1115 million USD per square kilometre against 0.1112 million USD per square kilometre in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.0003 million USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Sri Lanka ahead.

Rwanda ranks 26th and Sri Lanka ranks 27th of 180 countries.

Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Rwanda Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0241 million USD per square kilometre 0.0326 million USD per square kilometre 0.0086 million USD per square kilometre Sri Lanka
1980s 0.0369 million USD per square kilometre 0.0442 million USD per square kilometre 0.0072 million USD per square kilometre Sri Lanka
1990s 0.0303 million USD per square kilometre 0.0525 million USD per square kilometre 0.0222 million USD per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2000s 0.0497 million USD per square kilometre 0.0645 million USD per square kilometre 0.0148 million USD per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2010s 0.0813 million USD per square kilometre 0.1036 million USD per square kilometre 0.0223 million USD per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2020s 0.1077 million USD per square kilometre 0.1112 million USD per square kilometre 0.0034 million USD per square kilometre Sri Lanka

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015, Rwanda or Sri Lanka?
Rwanda, at 0.1115 million USD per square kilometre against 0.1112 million USD per square kilometre in Sri Lanka as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015 between Rwanda and Sri Lanka?
0.0003 million USD per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Sri Lanka?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Rwanda and Sri Lanka rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015?
Rwanda ranks 26th and Sri Lanka ranks 27th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Rwanda vs Sri Lanka: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/rwanda/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/rwanda/sri-lanka/">Rwanda vs Sri Lanka: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 9,031 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.