Rwanda vs Switzerland: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015

Rwanda
0.1115 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Switzerland
0.1125 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda rank
26th
Switzerland rank
25th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 over time

  • Rwanda
  • Switzerland
00.050.10.15197019962023

How they compare

Switzerland currently reports 0.1125 million USD per square kilometre against 0.1115 million USD per square kilometre in Rwanda, a difference of 0.001 million USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Switzerland ahead.

Rwanda ranks 26th and Switzerland ranks 25th of 180 countries.

Switzerland has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Rwanda Switzerland Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0241 million USD per square kilometre 0.1369 million USD per square kilometre 0.1128 million USD per square kilometre Switzerland
1980s 0.0369 million USD per square kilometre 0.1329 million USD per square kilometre 0.0959 million USD per square kilometre Switzerland
1990s 0.0303 million USD per square kilometre 0.1153 million USD per square kilometre 0.085 million USD per square kilometre Switzerland
2000s 0.0497 million USD per square kilometre 0.1083 million USD per square kilometre 0.0586 million USD per square kilometre Switzerland
2010s 0.0813 million USD per square kilometre 0.1138 million USD per square kilometre 0.0325 million USD per square kilometre Switzerland
2020s 0.1077 million USD per square kilometre 0.1104 million USD per square kilometre 0.0027 million USD per square kilometre Switzerland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015, Rwanda or Switzerland?
Switzerland, at 0.1125 million USD per square kilometre against 0.1115 million USD per square kilometre in Rwanda as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015 between Rwanda and Switzerland?
0.001 million USD per square kilometre, with Switzerland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Switzerland?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Rwanda and Switzerland rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015?
Rwanda ranks 26th and Switzerland ranks 25th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Rwanda vs Switzerland: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/rwanda/switzerland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/rwanda/switzerland/">Rwanda vs Switzerland: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 9,031 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.