South Africa vs Yemen: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015

South Africa
0.0076 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Yemen
0.0067 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
South Africa rank
147th
Yemen rank
150th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 over time

  • South Africa
  • Yemen
0.0030.0050.0070.010.013197019962023

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 0.0076 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0067 million USD per square kilometre in Yemen, a difference of 0.0009 million USD per square kilometre.

That makes South Africa's figure about 1.1 times Yemen's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1989 it was South Africa ahead.

South Africa ranks 147th and Yemen ranks 150th of 180 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, South Africa averaged higher in 2 and Yemen in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Africa Yemen Difference Ahead
1980s 0.0046 million USD per square kilometre 0.0033 million USD per square kilometre 0.0012 million USD per square kilometre South Africa
1990s 0.0041 million USD per square kilometre 0.0045 million USD per square kilometre 0.0005 million USD per square kilometre Yemen
2000s 0.0048 million USD per square kilometre 0.0079 million USD per square kilometre 0.0031 million USD per square kilometre Yemen
2010s 0.0063 million USD per square kilometre 0.0094 million USD per square kilometre 0.0031 million USD per square kilometre Yemen
2020s 0.0082 million USD per square kilometre 0.0067 million USD per square kilometre 0.0015 million USD per square kilometre South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015, South Africa or Yemen?
South Africa, at 0.0076 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0067 million USD per square kilometre in Yemen as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015 between South Africa and Yemen?
0.0009 million USD per square kilometre, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and Yemen?
35 years are reported by both, from 1989 to 2023.
How do South Africa and Yemen rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015?
South Africa ranks 147th and Yemen ranks 150th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South Africa vs Yemen: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/south-africa/yemen-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/south-africa/yemen-rep/">South Africa vs Yemen: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 9,031 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.