How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Grenada?

48 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Australia vs Grenada: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015

Australia

0 million USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Grenada

0 million USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Australia rank

114th

Grenada rank

113th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 over time

Australia
Grenada

How they compare

Grenada currently reports 0 million USD per US$ of GDP against 0 million USD per US$ of GDP in Australia, a difference of 0 million USD per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 48 shared years of data; in 1977 it was Grenada ahead.

Australia ranks 114th and Grenada ranks 113th of 179 countries.

Grenada has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Australia	Grenada	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Grenada
1980s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Grenada
1990s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Grenada
2000s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Grenada
2010s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Grenada
2020s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Grenada

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015, Australia or Grenada?: Grenada, at 0 million USD per US$ of GDP against 0 million USD per US$ of GDP in Australia as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015 between Australia and Grenada?: 0 million USD per US$ of GDP, with Grenada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Grenada?: 48 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 2024.
How do Australia and Grenada rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015?: Australia ranks 114th and Grenada ranks 113th of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Grenada: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-unit-of-gdp/australia/grenada/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-unit-of-gdp/australia/grenada/">Australia vs Grenada: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per unit of GDP
Unit: million USD per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 180 places, 8,888 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed: 11 September 2026

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.