How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Malta?

55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Austria vs Malta: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015

Austria

0 million USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Malta

0 million USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Austria rank

153rd

Malta rank

152nd

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 over time

Austria
Malta

How they compare

Malta currently reports 0 million USD per US$ of GDP against 0 million USD per US$ of GDP in Austria, a difference of 0 million USD per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Austria ahead.

Austria ranks 153rd and Malta ranks 152nd of 179 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Austria averaged higher in 2 and Malta in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Austria	Malta	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Malta
1980s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Malta
1990s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Malta
2000s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Malta
2010s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Austria
2020s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Austria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015, Austria or Malta?: Malta, at 0 million USD per US$ of GDP against 0 million USD per US$ of GDP in Austria as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015 between Austria and Malta?: 0 million USD per US$ of GDP, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Malta?: 55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Austria and Malta rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015?: Austria ranks 153rd and Malta ranks 152nd of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Austria vs Malta: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-unit-of-gdp/austria/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-unit-of-gdp/austria/malta/">Austria vs Malta: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per unit of GDP
Unit: million USD per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 180 places, 8,888 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed: 11 September 2026

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.