How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Bhutan?

55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Bangladesh vs Bhutan: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015

Bangladesh

0 million USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Bhutan

0 million USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Bangladesh rank

52nd

Bhutan rank

54th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 over time

Bangladesh
Bhutan

How they compare

Bangladesh currently reports 0 million USD per US$ of GDP against 0 million USD per US$ of GDP in Bhutan, a difference of 0 million USD per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Bhutan ahead.

Bangladesh ranks 52nd and Bhutan ranks 54th of 179 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 2 and Bhutan in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Bangladesh	Bhutan	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Bhutan
1980s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Bhutan
1990s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Bhutan
2000s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Bangladesh
2010s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Bangladesh
2020s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Bhutan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015, Bangladesh or Bhutan?: Bangladesh, at 0 million USD per US$ of GDP against 0 million USD per US$ of GDP in Bhutan as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015 between Bangladesh and Bhutan?: 0 million USD per US$ of GDP, with Bangladesh ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Bhutan?: 55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Bangladesh and Bhutan rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015?: Bangladesh ranks 52nd and Bhutan ranks 54th of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs Bhutan: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-unit-of-gdp/bangladesh/bhutan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-unit-of-gdp/bangladesh/bhutan/">Bangladesh vs Bhutan: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per unit of GDP
Unit: million USD per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 180 places, 8,888 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed: 11 September 2026

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.