Belarus vs Zimbabwe: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015

Belarus
0 million USD per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Zimbabwe
0 million USD per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Belarus rank
87th
Zimbabwe rank
86th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 over time

  • Belarus
  • Zimbabwe
000000197019972024

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0 million USD per US$ of GDP against 0 million USD per US$ of GDP in Belarus, a difference of 0 million USD per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Belarus ranks 87th and Zimbabwe ranks 86th of 179 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 0 million USD per US$ of GDP 0 million USD per US$ of GDP 0 million USD per US$ of GDP Zimbabwe
2000s 0 million USD per US$ of GDP 0 million USD per US$ of GDP 0 million USD per US$ of GDP Zimbabwe
2010s 0 million USD per US$ of GDP 0 million USD per US$ of GDP 0 million USD per US$ of GDP Zimbabwe
2020s 0 million USD per US$ of GDP 0 million USD per US$ of GDP 0 million USD per US$ of GDP Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015, Belarus or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 0 million USD per US$ of GDP against 0 million USD per US$ of GDP in Belarus as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015 between Belarus and Zimbabwe?
0 million USD per US$ of GDP, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Zimbabwe?
34 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
How do Belarus and Zimbabwe rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015?
Belarus ranks 87th and Zimbabwe ranks 86th of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Zimbabwe: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-unit-of-gdp/belarus/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-unit-of-gdp/belarus/zimbabwe/">Belarus vs Zimbabwe: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per unit of GDP
Unit
million USD per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 8,888 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.