How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Costa Rica?

55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Chile vs Costa Rica: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015

Chile

0 million USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Costa Rica

0 million USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Chile rank

109th

Costa Rica rank

108th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 over time

Chile
Costa Rica

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports 0 million USD per US$ of GDP against 0 million USD per US$ of GDP in Chile, a difference of 0 million USD per US$ of GDP.

Across all 55 years both countries report, Costa Rica has been ahead every year.

Chile ranks 109th and Costa Rica ranks 108th of 179 countries.

Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Chile	Costa Rica	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Costa Rica
1980s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Costa Rica
1990s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Costa Rica
2000s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Costa Rica
2010s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Costa Rica
2020s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Costa Rica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015, Chile or Costa Rica?: Costa Rica, at 0 million USD per US$ of GDP against 0 million USD per US$ of GDP in Chile as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015 between Chile and Costa Rica?: 0 million USD per US$ of GDP, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Costa Rica?: 55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Chile and Costa Rica rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015?: Chile ranks 109th and Costa Rica ranks 108th of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Costa Rica: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-unit-of-gdp/chile/costa-rica/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-unit-of-gdp/chile/costa-rica/">Chile vs Costa Rica: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per unit of GDP
Unit: million USD per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 180 places, 8,888 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed: 11 September 2026

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.