How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Malaysia?

55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Congo vs Malaysia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015

Congo

0 million USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Malaysia

0 million USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Congo rank

73rd

Malaysia rank

72nd

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 over time

Congo
Malaysia

How they compare

Malaysia currently reports 0 million USD per US$ of GDP against 0 million USD per US$ of GDP in Congo, a difference of 0 million USD per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Malaysia ahead.

Congo ranks 73rd and Malaysia ranks 72nd of 179 countries.

Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Congo	Malaysia	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Malaysia
1980s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Malaysia
1990s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Malaysia
2000s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Malaysia
2010s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Malaysia
2020s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Malaysia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015, Congo or Malaysia?: Malaysia, at 0 million USD per US$ of GDP against 0 million USD per US$ of GDP in Congo as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015 between Congo and Malaysia?: 0 million USD per US$ of GDP, with Malaysia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Malaysia?: 55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Congo and Malaysia rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015?: Congo ranks 73rd and Malaysia ranks 72nd of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Malaysia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-unit-of-gdp/congo-rep/malaysia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-unit-of-gdp/congo-rep/malaysia/">Congo vs Malaysia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per unit of GDP
Unit: million USD per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 180 places, 8,888 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed: 11 September 2026

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.