How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Tunisia?

55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Ecuador vs Tunisia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015

Ecuador

0 million USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Tunisia

0 million USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Ecuador rank

60th

Tunisia rank

59th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 over time

Ecuador
Tunisia

How they compare

Tunisia currently reports 0 million USD per US$ of GDP against 0 million USD per US$ of GDP in Ecuador, a difference of 0 million USD per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Tunisia ahead.

Ecuador ranks 60th and Tunisia ranks 59th of 179 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 2 and Tunisia in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Ecuador	Tunisia	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Tunisia
1980s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Tunisia
1990s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Ecuador
2000s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Ecuador
2010s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Tunisia
2020s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Tunisia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015, Ecuador or Tunisia?: Tunisia, at 0 million USD per US$ of GDP against 0 million USD per US$ of GDP in Ecuador as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015 between Ecuador and Tunisia?: 0 million USD per US$ of GDP, with Tunisia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Tunisia?: 55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Ecuador and Tunisia rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015?: Ecuador ranks 60th and Tunisia ranks 59th of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Tunisia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-unit-of-gdp/ecuador/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-unit-of-gdp/ecuador/tunisia/">Ecuador vs Tunisia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per unit of GDP
Unit: million USD per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 180 places, 8,888 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed: 11 September 2026

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.