Equatorial Guinea vs Latvia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015

Equatorial Guinea
0 million USD per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Latvia
0 million USD per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Equatorial Guinea rank
128th
Latvia rank
129th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Latvia
0000197019972024

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 0 million USD per US$ of GDP against 0 million USD per US$ of GDP in Latvia, a difference of 0 million USD per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 128th and Latvia ranks 129th of 179 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 2 and Latvia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Latvia Difference Ahead
1990s 0 million USD per US$ of GDP 0 million USD per US$ of GDP 0 million USD per US$ of GDP Equatorial Guinea
2000s 0 million USD per US$ of GDP 0 million USD per US$ of GDP 0 million USD per US$ of GDP Equatorial Guinea
2010s 0 million USD per US$ of GDP 0 million USD per US$ of GDP 0 million USD per US$ of GDP Latvia
2020s 0 million USD per US$ of GDP 0 million USD per US$ of GDP 0 million USD per US$ of GDP Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015, Equatorial Guinea or Latvia?
Equatorial Guinea, at 0 million USD per US$ of GDP against 0 million USD per US$ of GDP in Latvia as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015 between Equatorial Guinea and Latvia?
0 million USD per US$ of GDP, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Latvia?
30 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2024.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Latvia rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 128th and Latvia ranks 129th of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Latvia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-unit-of-gdp/equatorial-guinea/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-unit-of-gdp/equatorial-guinea/latvia/">Equatorial Guinea vs Latvia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per unit of GDP
Unit
million USD per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 8,888 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.