How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Thailand?

55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Eswatini vs Thailand: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015

Eswatini

0 million USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Thailand

0 million USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Eswatini rank

65th

Thailand rank

67th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 over time

Eswatini
Thailand

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 0 million USD per US$ of GDP against 0 million USD per US$ of GDP in Thailand, a difference of 0 million USD per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Thailand ahead.

Eswatini ranks 65th and Thailand ranks 67th of 179 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 1 and Thailand in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Eswatini	Thailand	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Thailand
1980s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Eswatini
1990s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Thailand
2000s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Thailand
2010s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Thailand
2020s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Thailand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015, Eswatini or Thailand?: Eswatini, at 0 million USD per US$ of GDP against 0 million USD per US$ of GDP in Thailand as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015 between Eswatini and Thailand?: 0 million USD per US$ of GDP, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Thailand?: 55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Eswatini and Thailand rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015?: Eswatini ranks 65th and Thailand ranks 67th of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Thailand: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-unit-of-gdp/eswatini/thailand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-unit-of-gdp/eswatini/thailand/">Eswatini vs Thailand: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per unit of GDP
Unit: million USD per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 180 places, 8,888 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed: 11 September 2026

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.