How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Ghana?

55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Gambia vs Ghana: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015

Gambia

0 million USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Ghana

0 million USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Gambia rank

28th

Ghana rank

26th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 over time

Gambia
Ghana

How they compare

Ghana currently reports 0 million USD per US$ of GDP against 0 million USD per US$ of GDP in Gambia, a difference of 0 million USD per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Gambia ahead.

Gambia ranks 28th and Ghana ranks 26th of 179 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Gambia averaged higher in 3 and Ghana in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Gambia	Ghana	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Gambia
1980s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Gambia
1990s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Ghana
2000s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Ghana
2010s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Gambia
2020s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Ghana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015, Gambia or Ghana?: Ghana, at 0 million USD per US$ of GDP against 0 million USD per US$ of GDP in Gambia as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015 between Gambia and Ghana?: 0 million USD per US$ of GDP, with Ghana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Ghana?: 55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Gambia and Ghana rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015?: Gambia ranks 28th and Ghana ranks 26th of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Gambia vs Ghana: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-unit-of-gdp/gambia-the/ghana/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-unit-of-gdp/gambia-the/ghana/">Gambia vs Ghana: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per unit of GDP
Unit: million USD per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 180 places, 8,888 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed: 11 September 2026

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.