How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Kiribati?

55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Gambia vs Kiribati: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015

Gambia

0 million USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Kiribati

0 million USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Gambia rank

28th

Kiribati rank

29th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 over time

Gambia
Kiribati

How they compare

Gambia currently reports 0 million USD per US$ of GDP against 0 million USD per US$ of GDP in Kiribati, a difference of 0 million USD per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Gambia ahead.

Gambia ranks 28th and Kiribati ranks 29th of 179 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Gambia averaged higher in 1 and Kiribati in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Gambia	Kiribati	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Gambia
1980s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Kiribati
1990s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Kiribati
2000s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Kiribati
2010s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Kiribati
2020s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Kiribati

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015, Gambia or Kiribati?: Gambia, at 0 million USD per US$ of GDP against 0 million USD per US$ of GDP in Kiribati as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015 between Gambia and Kiribati?: 0 million USD per US$ of GDP, with Gambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Kiribati?: 55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Gambia and Kiribati rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015?: Gambia ranks 28th and Kiribati ranks 29th of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Gambia vs Kiribati: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-unit-of-gdp/gambia-the/kiribati/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-unit-of-gdp/gambia-the/kiribati/">Gambia vs Kiribati: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per unit of GDP
Unit: million USD per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 180 places, 8,888 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed: 11 September 2026

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.