How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and Uganda?

55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Ghana vs Uganda: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015

Ghana

0 million USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Uganda

0 million USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Ghana rank

26th

Uganda rank

27th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 over time

Ghana
Uganda

How they compare

Ghana currently reports 0 million USD per US$ of GDP against 0 million USD per US$ of GDP in Uganda, a difference of 0 million USD per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Uganda ahead.

Ghana ranks 26th and Uganda ranks 27th of 179 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Ghana averaged higher in 1 and Uganda in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Ghana	Uganda	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Uganda
1980s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Uganda
1990s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Uganda
2000s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Ghana
2010s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Uganda
2020s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Uganda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015, Ghana or Uganda?: Ghana, at 0 million USD per US$ of GDP against 0 million USD per US$ of GDP in Uganda as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015 between Ghana and Uganda?: 0 million USD per US$ of GDP, with Ghana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and Uganda?: 55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Ghana and Uganda rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015?: Ghana ranks 26th and Uganda ranks 27th of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ghana vs Uganda: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-unit-of-gdp/ghana/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-unit-of-gdp/ghana/uganda/">Ghana vs Uganda: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per unit of GDP
Unit: million USD per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 180 places, 8,888 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed: 11 September 2026

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.