Ireland vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015

Ireland
0 million USD per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Saint Kitts and Nevis
0 million USD per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Ireland rank
160th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
158th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 over time

  • Ireland
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
00000197019972024

How they compare

Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 0 million USD per US$ of GDP against 0 million USD per US$ of GDP in Ireland, a difference of 0 million USD per US$ of GDP.

That makes Saint Kitts and Nevis's figure about 1.1 times Ireland's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.

Ireland ranks 160th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 158th of 179 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Ireland averaged higher in 2 and Saint Kitts and Nevis in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ireland Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
1970s 0 million USD per US$ of GDP 0 million USD per US$ of GDP 0 million USD per US$ of GDP Saint Kitts and Nevis
1980s 0 million USD per US$ of GDP 0 million USD per US$ of GDP 0 million USD per US$ of GDP Ireland
1990s 0 million USD per US$ of GDP 0 million USD per US$ of GDP 0 million USD per US$ of GDP Ireland
2000s 0 million USD per US$ of GDP 0 million USD per US$ of GDP 0 million USD per US$ of GDP Saint Kitts and Nevis
2010s 0 million USD per US$ of GDP 0 million USD per US$ of GDP 0 million USD per US$ of GDP Saint Kitts and Nevis
2020s 0 million USD per US$ of GDP 0 million USD per US$ of GDP 0 million USD per US$ of GDP Saint Kitts and Nevis

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015, Ireland or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 0 million USD per US$ of GDP against 0 million USD per US$ of GDP in Ireland as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015 between Ireland and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
0 million USD per US$ of GDP, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ireland and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Ireland and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015?
Ireland ranks 160th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 158th of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ireland vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-unit-of-gdp/ireland/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-unit-of-gdp/ireland/st-kitts-and-nevis/">Ireland vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per unit of GDP
Unit
million USD per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 8,888 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.