How many years of comparable data are there for Italy and Naoero?

55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Italy vs Naoero: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015

Italy

0 million USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Naoero

0 million USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Italy rank

141st

Naoero rank

140th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 over time

Italy
Naoero

How they compare

Naoero currently reports 0 million USD per US$ of GDP against 0 million USD per US$ of GDP in Italy, a difference of 0 million USD per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Naoero ahead.

Italy ranks 141st and Naoero ranks 140th of 179 countries.

Naoero has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Italy	Naoero	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Naoero
1980s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Naoero
1990s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Naoero
2000s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Naoero
2010s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Naoero
2020s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Naoero

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015, Italy or Naoero?: Naoero, at 0 million USD per US$ of GDP against 0 million USD per US$ of GDP in Italy as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015 between Italy and Naoero?: 0 million USD per US$ of GDP, with Naoero ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Italy and Naoero?: 55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Italy and Naoero rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015?: Italy ranks 141st and Naoero ranks 140th of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Italy vs Naoero: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-unit-of-gdp/italy/naoero/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-unit-of-gdp/italy/naoero/">Italy vs Naoero: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per unit of GDP
Unit: million USD per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 180 places, 8,888 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed: 11 September 2026

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.