How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Tuvalu?

55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Sri Lanka vs Tuvalu: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015

Sri Lanka

0 million USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Tuvalu

0 million USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Sri Lanka rank

69th

Tuvalu rank

68th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 over time

Sri Lanka
Tuvalu

How they compare

Tuvalu currently reports 0 million USD per US$ of GDP against 0 million USD per US$ of GDP in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0 million USD per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Tuvalu ahead.

Sri Lanka ranks 69th and Tuvalu ranks 68th of 179 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Sri Lanka averaged higher in 1 and Tuvalu in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Sri Lanka	Tuvalu	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Tuvalu
1980s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Tuvalu
1990s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Tuvalu
2000s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Tuvalu
2010s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Tuvalu
2020s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Sri Lanka

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015, Sri Lanka or Tuvalu?: Tuvalu, at 0 million USD per US$ of GDP against 0 million USD per US$ of GDP in Sri Lanka as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015 between Sri Lanka and Tuvalu?: 0 million USD per US$ of GDP, with Tuvalu ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Tuvalu?: 55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Sri Lanka and Tuvalu rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015?: Sri Lanka ranks 69th and Tuvalu ranks 68th of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sri Lanka vs Tuvalu: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-unit-of-gdp/sri-lanka/tuvalu/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-2015-prices-per-unit-of-gdp/sri-lanka/tuvalu/">Sri Lanka vs Tuvalu: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices, per unit of GDP
Unit: million USD per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 180 places, 8,888 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed: 11 September 2026

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.