Australia and New Zealand vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 over time
- Australia and New Zealand
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
How they compare
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) currently reports 262,025 million USD against 53,208 million USD in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 208,817 million USD.
That makes Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s figure about 4.9 times Australia and New Zealand's.
Across all 55 years both countries report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has been ahead every year.
Australia and New Zealand ranks 13th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 11th of 233 countries.
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia and New Zealand | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 16,555 million USD | 61,347 million USD | 44,792 million USD | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 1980s | 19,507 million USD | 73,307 million USD | 53,800 million USD | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 1990s | 25,775 million USD | 99,694 million USD | 73,919 million USD | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2000s | 33,714 million USD | 141,332 million USD | 107,618 million USD | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2010s | 38,350 million USD | 201,475 million USD | 163,125 million USD | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2020s | 46,865 million USD | 248,682 million USD | 201,817 million USD | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015, Australia and New Zealand or Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), at 262,025 million USD against 53,208 million USD in Australia and New Zealand as of 2024.
- What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015 between Australia and New Zealand and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- 208,817 million USD, with Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- 55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
- How do Australia and New Zealand and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, 2015?
- Australia and New Zealand ranks 13th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 11th of 233 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT Macro Indicators database provides a selection of country-level macro indicators relating to total economy (Gross Domestic Product, Gross Fixed Capital Formation); agriculture activity; agriculture, forestry and fishing activity; total manufacturing activity; manufacturing of food products and beverages activity; manufacturing activity of tobacco products; and manufacturing activity of food, beverage and tobacco products.It releases time series for a selection of National Accounts variables, including gross domestic product, gross fixed capital formation, industry-level value added and gross output. The database also proposes additional indicators such as gross domestic product per capita, year-on-year growth rates and measures of industry contribution to gross domestic product. All data relating to Gross Domestic Product, Gross Fixed Capital Formation, agriculture, forestry and fishing activity, and to total manufacturing activity originates from the United Nations Statistics Division (UNSD) National Accounts Estimates of Main Aggregates database, which consists of a complete and consistent set of time series of the main National Accounts aggregates of all UN Members States and other territories in the world for which National Accounts information is available. The UNSD database's content is based on the countries' official National Accounts data reported to UNSD through the annual National Accounts Questionnaire, supplemented with data estimates for any years and countries with incomplete or inconsistent information (See http://unstats.un.org/unsd/snaama/Introduction.asp). Data series relating to the sub-industry Agriculture activity are obtained from the UNSD national accounts Official Country Data databases while series on the Manufacturing activity of food and beverages products, manufacturing activity of tobacco products and manufacturing activity of food, beverages and tobacco products originates from the United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO) INDSTAT2 database. In order to ensure that sub-industry series are consistent in levels with National Accounts based series, which is needed to support comparability across industries (agriculture vs. agro-industry and sub-industries), UNIDO originating series are rescaled on UNSD National Accounts Estimates of Main Aggregates data series (See Section 17.5 for a more detailed description of the data processing steps).