Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Russian Federation: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, annual

Bosnia and Herzegovina
-6.08 % change on previous year
in 2024
Russian Federation
-3.85 % change on previous year
in 2024
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
186th
Russian Federation rank
183rd

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, annual over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Russian Federation
-50-2502550199120072024

How they compare

Russian Federation currently reports -3.85 % change on previous year against -6.08 % change on previous year in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 2.23 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 21 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 186th and Russian Federation ranks 183rd of 218 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 1 and Russian Federation in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Russian Federation Difference Ahead
1990s -4.3 % change on previous year -17.53 % change on previous year 13.23 % change on previous year Bosnia and Herzegovina
2000s 8.25 % change on previous year 15.74 % change on previous year 7.49 % change on previous year Russian Federation
2010s -0.4536 % change on previous year 2.58 % change on previous year 3.04 % change on previous year Russian Federation
2020s 1.76 % change on previous year 4.74 % change on previous year 2.97 % change on previous year Russian Federation

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, annual, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Russian Federation?
Russian Federation, at -3.85 % change on previous year against -6.08 % change on previous year in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, annual between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Russian Federation?
2.23 % change on previous year, with Russian Federation ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Russian Federation?
33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Russian Federation rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, annual?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 186th and Russian Federation ranks 183rd of 218 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Russian Federation: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, annual. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-annual-growth-rate/bosnia-and-herzegovina/russian-federation-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-annual-growth-rate/bosnia-and-herzegovina/russian-federation-2/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Russian Federation: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, annual</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
249 places, 12,518 data points, 1971–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.