Czechoslovakia vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, annual

Czechoslovakia
38.38 % change on previous year
in 1989
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
11.38 % change on previous year
in 2024
Czechoslovakia rank
4th
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
5th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, annual over time

  • Czechoslovakia
  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
-200204060197119972024

How they compare

Czechoslovakia currently reports 38.38 % change on previous year against 11.38 % change on previous year in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), a difference of 27 % change on previous year.

That makes Czechoslovakia's figure about 3.4 times Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 19 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.

Czechoslovakia ranks 4th and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 5th of 218 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Czechoslovakia averaged higher in 1 and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Czechoslovakia Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Difference Ahead
1970s 9.11 % change on previous year 11.75 % change on previous year 2.64 % change on previous year Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
1980s 6.84 % change on previous year 3.58 % change on previous year 3.25 % change on previous year Czechoslovakia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, annual, Czechoslovakia or Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
Czechoslovakia, at 38.38 % change on previous year against 11.38 % change on previous year in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) as of 1989.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, annual between Czechoslovakia and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
27 % change on previous year, with Czechoslovakia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Czechoslovakia and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
19 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 1989.
How do Czechoslovakia and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, annual?
Czechoslovakia ranks 4th and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 5th of 218 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Czechoslovakia vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, annual. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-annual-growth-rate/czechoslovakia/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-annual-growth-rate/czechoslovakia/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/">Czechoslovakia vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, annual</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
249 places, 12,518 data points, 1971–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.