Equatorial Guinea vs Switzerland: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, annual

Equatorial Guinea
5.33 % change on previous year
in 2024
Switzerland
5.35 % change on previous year
in 2024
Equatorial Guinea rank
100th
Switzerland rank
97th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, annual over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Switzerland
-50050100197119972024

How they compare

Switzerland currently reports 5.35 % change on previous year against 5.33 % change on previous year in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.02 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 26 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Switzerland ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 100th and Switzerland ranks 97th of 218 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 5 and Switzerland in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Switzerland Difference Ahead
1970s 10.82 % change on previous year 18.88 % change on previous year 8.05 % change on previous year Switzerland
1980s 10.59 % change on previous year 6.16 % change on previous year 4.44 % change on previous year Equatorial Guinea
1990s 9.57 % change on previous year -2.37 % change on previous year 11.94 % change on previous year Equatorial Guinea
2000s 19.78 % change on previous year 2.82 % change on previous year 16.96 % change on previous year Equatorial Guinea
2010s 6.16 % change on previous year 2.05 % change on previous year 4.11 % change on previous year Equatorial Guinea
2020s 5.99 % change on previous year 4.87 % change on previous year 1.11 % change on previous year Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, annual, Equatorial Guinea or Switzerland?
Switzerland, at 5.35 % change on previous year against 5.33 % change on previous year in Equatorial Guinea as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, annual between Equatorial Guinea and Switzerland?
0.02 % change on previous year, with Switzerland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Switzerland?
54 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2024.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Switzerland rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, annual?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 100th and Switzerland ranks 97th of 218 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Switzerland: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, annual. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-annual-growth-rate/equatorial-guinea/switzerland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-annual-growth-rate/equatorial-guinea/switzerland/">Equatorial Guinea vs Switzerland: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, annual</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
249 places, 12,518 data points, 1971–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.