Least Developed Countries (LDCs) vs South Africa: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, annual

Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
1.07 % change on previous year
in 2024
South Africa
17.38 % change on previous year
in 2024
Least Developed Countries (LDCs) rank
22nd
South Africa rank
20th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, annual over time

  • Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
  • South Africa
-200204060197119972024

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 17.38 % change on previous year against 1.07 % change on previous year in Least Developed Countries (LDCs), a difference of 16.31 % change on previous year.

That makes South Africa's figure about 16.2 times Least Developed Countries (LDCs)'s.

The two have swapped places 26 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1971 it was South Africa ahead.

Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 22nd and South Africa ranks 20th of 31 groups.

Across the 6 decades both report, Least Developed Countries (LDCs) averaged higher in 3 and South Africa in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Least Developed Countries (LDCs) South Africa Difference Ahead
1970s 11.02 % change on previous year 12.68 % change on previous year 1.65 % change on previous year South Africa
1980s 3.32 % change on previous year 6.58 % change on previous year 3.26 % change on previous year South Africa
1990s 1.43 % change on previous year -0.6768 % change on previous year 2.11 % change on previous year Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
2000s 9.77 % change on previous year 7.11 % change on previous year 2.65 % change on previous year Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
2010s 4.37 % change on previous year 0.1576 % change on previous year 4.22 % change on previous year Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
2020s 5.43 % change on previous year 9.08 % change on previous year 3.66 % change on previous year South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, annual, Least Developed Countries (LDCs) or South Africa?
South Africa, at 17.38 % change on previous year against 1.07 % change on previous year in Least Developed Countries (LDCs) as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, annual between Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and South Africa?
16.31 % change on previous year, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and South Africa?
54 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2024.
How do Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and South Africa rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, annual?
Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 22nd and South Africa ranks 20th of 31 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Least Developed Countries (LDCs) vs South Africa: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, annual. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-annual-growth-rate/least-developed-countries-ldcs/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-annual-growth-rate/least-developed-countries-ldcs/south-africa/">Least Developed Countries (LDCs) vs South Africa: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, annual</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
249 places, 12,518 data points, 1971–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.