Northern Africa vs South Sudan: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, annual

Northern Africa
13.46 % change on previous year
in 2024
South Sudan
70.33 % change on previous year
in 2024
Northern Africa rank
3rd
South Sudan rank
2nd

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, annual over time

  • Northern Africa
  • South Sudan
-50050100197119972024

How they compare

South Sudan currently reports 70.33 % change on previous year against 13.46 % change on previous year in Northern Africa, a difference of 56.87 % change on previous year.

That makes South Sudan's figure about 5.2 times Northern Africa's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2009 it was South Sudan ahead.

Northern Africa ranks 3rd and South Sudan ranks 2nd of 31 groups.

Across the 3 decades both report, Northern Africa averaged higher in 1 and South Sudan in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Northern Africa South Sudan Difference Ahead
2000s 3.47 % change on previous year 7.13 % change on previous year 3.66 % change on previous year South Sudan
2010s 1.86 % change on previous year -1.94 % change on previous year 3.8 % change on previous year Northern Africa
2020s 4.26 % change on previous year 23.39 % change on previous year 19.13 % change on previous year South Sudan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, annual, Northern Africa or South Sudan?
South Sudan, at 70.33 % change on previous year against 13.46 % change on previous year in Northern Africa as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, annual between Northern Africa and South Sudan?
56.87 % change on previous year, with South Sudan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Northern Africa and South Sudan?
16 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2024.
How do Northern Africa and South Sudan rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, annual?
Northern Africa ranks 3rd and South Sudan ranks 2nd of 31 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Northern Africa vs South Sudan: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, annual. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-annual-growth-rate/northern-africa/south-sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-annual-growth-rate/northern-africa/south-sudan/">Northern Africa vs South Sudan: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, annual</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
249 places, 12,518 data points, 1971–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.