How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and South Sudan?

17 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Aruba vs South Sudan: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per

Aruba

0 million USD per person

in 2024

South Sudan

0 million USD per person

in 2024

Aruba rank

179th

South Sudan rank

178th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per over time

Aruba
South Sudan

How they compare

South Sudan currently reports 0 million USD per person against 0 million USD per person in Aruba, a difference of 0 million USD per person.

That makes South Sudan's figure about 2.0 times Aruba's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2008 it was South Sudan ahead.

Aruba ranks 179th and South Sudan ranks 178th of 180 countries.

South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Aruba	South Sudan	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0 million USD per person	0.0001 million USD per person	0.0001 million USD per person	South Sudan
2010s	0 million USD per person	0 million USD per person	0 million USD per person	South Sudan
2020s	0 million USD per person	0 million USD per person	0 million USD per person	South Sudan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per, Aruba or South Sudan?: South Sudan, at 0 million USD per person against 0 million USD per person in Aruba as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per between Aruba and South Sudan?: 0 million USD per person, with South Sudan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and South Sudan?: 17 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2024.
How do Aruba and South Sudan rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per?: Aruba ranks 179th and South Sudan ranks 178th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Aruba vs South Sudan: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-capita/aruba/south-sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-capita/aruba/south-sudan/">Aruba vs South Sudan: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per capita
Unit: million USD per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 181 places, 9,366 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed: 12 September 2026

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$ divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.