How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and New Caledonia?

55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Austria vs New Caledonia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per

Austria

0.0007 million USD per person

in 2024

New Caledonia

0.0007 million USD per person

in 2024

Austria rank

34th

New Caledonia rank

32nd

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per over time

Austria
New Caledonia

How they compare

New Caledonia currently reports 0.0007 million USD per person against 0.0007 million USD per person in Austria, a difference of 0 million USD per person.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was New Caledonia ahead.

Austria ranks 34th and New Caledonia ranks 32nd of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Austria averaged higher in 4 and New Caledonia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Austria	New Caledonia	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0.0003 million USD per person	0.0002 million USD per person	0.0001 million USD per person	Austria
1980s	0.0004 million USD per person	0.0001 million USD per person	0.0003 million USD per person	Austria
1990s	0.0006 million USD per person	0.0003 million USD per person	0.0003 million USD per person	Austria
2000s	0.0005 million USD per person	0.0004 million USD per person	0.0001 million USD per person	Austria
2010s	0.0006 million USD per person	0.0006 million USD per person	0 million USD per person	New Caledonia
2020s	0.0007 million USD per person	0.0007 million USD per person	0 million USD per person	New Caledonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per, Austria or New Caledonia?: New Caledonia, at 0.0007 million USD per person against 0.0007 million USD per person in Austria as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per between Austria and New Caledonia?: 0 million USD per person, with New Caledonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and New Caledonia?: 55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Austria and New Caledonia rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per?: Austria ranks 34th and New Caledonia ranks 32nd of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Austria vs New Caledonia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-capita/austria/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-capita/austria/new-caledonia/">Austria vs New Caledonia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per capita
Unit: million USD per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 181 places, 9,366 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed: 12 September 2026

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$ divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.